A strong, powerful predator in the seawaters, such as a shark, can do great damage to the other species living in the same habitat.
The same principle can be applied to our topic of discussion: high frequency trading (this will be my continuing topic for the near future). The shark here is high frequency trading, the sea being the financial markets, and the other species sharing the same habitat with the shark as all other trading participants within the market. Just as a hungry shark would effortlessly hunt down and consume, not one, or two, or three, but a whole shoal of its prey, the high frequency trading practitioners are just as hungry in the markets when it comes to volume. And my gosh are they hungry! Not only are high frequency firms dissatisfied with a dominating statistic of 70% of the overall volume in the U.S. equities market, they are now accounting for a third of all trading activity in the European markets. And it isn’t just in the developed markets that high frequency trading takes place nowadays. Emerging markets such as Brazil, Mexico and China are all engaging in such activity as well.
The operation of high frequency trading is based on rapid trading of thousands of orders systematically and automatically by computers that analyse instantaneous changes in prices and quotes. This often results in other participants in the market, such as retail and institutional investors, chasing artificial prices, in the sense that these will not be the eventual prices at which their orders will be executed. Reasonably, debates about this topic materialized and evolved until a popular argument was formed that high frequency trading holds an “unfair” advantage. This extra feature that other traders in the market don’t possess, namely speed, has been listed top of the pile in “unfair” advantage. But is it really unfair in the sense that other traders have not deployed enough capital to be able to implement the same technology within their corporation? Or is it unfair because high frequency traders are soaking up all the liquidity and quotes?
And so the controversy continues and grows….